Flutter development

Flutter is one of our favorite technologies. It’s great if you want to test your mobile app on multiple markets and need to do it fast. If you are introducing a completely new service, investing in a cross-platform app is a much better choice than going native.

Top cross-platform development framework

Flutter became a star of mobile app development in the past few years

This widget-based technology allows building iOS and Android apps on a one code base. What’s even more exceptional is that it gives a true native-like feeling thanks to its great UI building method.

Projects developed with Flutter

Why Flutter?


Open source community

Creating robust and appealing apps in no time is a piece of cake 

Open-source community and constant support from Flutter’s creator Google is what makes it grow and offer countless possibilities. Our developers are the part of it, regularly presenting at local and international events and creating their own libraries. 



Building a mobile app for Android and iOS with just one go

It allows us to avoid delays and provide a much better time-to-market. Changes can be introduced almost instantly and appear in all versions at the same time – there’s no need to edit more than one code.


Business friendly

An esthetic mobile app with all required functionalities 

If you want to join the innovative brands that decided to trust this extraordinary framework, you won’t be sorry. It’s the most recommended way to go. Read more about pros and cons of Flutter.

Additional advantages

Time saver

Compared to native solutions, the development process is fast and helps save both time and money.

Qualitative UX

Customizable UI widgets are responsible for native-like UX and substantially raise its quality.

High productivity

Great performance rates that speed up and optimize the process are definitely included.

Easily adaptive

Introducing significant changes is simple and takes less time regardless of their complexity.


Sharing not only codebase but also UI code and UI itself between the target platforms provides high consistency.


High-performance cross-platform rendering engine makes the tool incredibly potent and enhances a product’s performance.


We always use the most reccommended modern tools following hi-tech trends and taking care of your product’s quality. Choosing the most appreciated partners allows us to make your application both up-to-date and efficient, providing your audience with the best possible results.

Our work is supported by:

  • Flutter Flutter
  • Dart Dart
  • Firebase Firebase
  • Apple Apple
  • Android Android

How to start? Prepare a concept!

Native vs. hybrid – which technology to choose?

Deciding which type of application will best suit your needs is not easy, as the offer differs in terms of time and cost of project implementation, and you want to know the pros and cons of each approach. You can easily get confused by the ever-changing technology and the mixed signals you get from different sources. So, who’s right? Are there any universal rules you should follow?


Native apps are what most people associate with the word “application”.

They are created exactly for a specific operating system and can only be downloaded and installed on devices for which they were designed. Depending on the operating system for which they are addressed, they are created with the use of the Swift or Objective-C programming languages ​(for iOS) and Kotlin or Java (for Android). Their very specific feature is that it is impossible to run Android apps on an Apple product and vice versa. Google and Apple are competing companies that don’t make it easy for us.

Native apps pros:

  • They usually have the best UX because they are loved by users (so much that some of them loudly manifest their loyalty to their favorite operating system).

  • They have the fastest and most reliable access to a wide range of functionalities of mobile devices, such as GPS, camera, gyroscope or microphone.

Native apps cons:

  • Higher development costs because the application must be written separately for each operating system if we decide to publish in both the App Store and Google Play.

  • As a result, the update process is also more complicated and must be carried out for each operating system separately.

  • The need to implement two separate teams of specialists with appropriate programming experience for each operating system, which increases the time and cost of production as well as maintenance of the mobile application.


There are other platforms than Android and iOS, but these two are the most known and loved. 

Android’s market share is larger, probably due to the number of smartphone manufacturers, while Apple is the sole developer of iOS devices. In total, there are over 5 million applications for these two leading platforms, and historically, it was quite expensive to create one mobile solution for them both. 

Hybrid apps pros:

  • The decision to write an application in Flutter brings a reduction in time and costs, because only one team of specialists works on the code.

  • One development team is less likely to misunderstand an app’s specification and features, which happens sometimes for two different natively written applications.

  • Flutter is based on so-called “widgets”, which can be freely compared to Lego bricks. They are small, reusable pieces of code that connect with other elements to form the whole application. Thanks to this solution, the process of development is much more efficient, because it doesn’t involve the need to rewrite the same code in different parts of the app.

Hybrid apps cons:

  • Share of hybrid technologies in the market is only 4%, although statistics show a sharp increase in recent years due to the huge support for the development of Flutter technology from Google.

  • Flutter doesn’t yet have as many libraries and ready-made components as native technologies, which can be problematic for more complex projects that require multiple integrations.

Customer’s review

The contract was executed honestly, with due diligence, and within the allotted time. The quality guarantee and technical support was carried out professionally and in accordance with the contract.

Other technologies

Mobile development

Mobile development

More Mobile development